August 1 – Promotion – Article 16.6(v)
by August 1 the candidate shall have provided to the Department Head or Dean such information as the candidate wishes to introduce
Read More »
by August 1 the candidate shall have provided to the Department Head or Dean such information as the candidate wishes to introduce
Read More »
by August 1 the candidate shall have provided to the Department Head or Dean such information as the candidate wishes to introduce
Read More »
by August 1 the candidate shall have provided to the Department Head or Dean such information as the candidate wishes to introduce
Read More »Professor Marie Battiste of the Department of Educational Foundations and Academic Director of the Aboriginal Education Research Centre was presented with the Canadian Association of University Teachers Distinguished Academic Award at its 2013 Spring Council Meeting. The CAUT Distinguished Academic Award recognizes academics who excel in each of the domains of academic life: teaching, research, […]
Read More »On behalf of the USFA Executive Committee, I would like to invite you to our next member social on Tuesday, June 18th, 2013 at 4:00 pm. I would like to extend a special invitation to those of you who had your probation renewed, were awarded tenure or were promoted effective July 1st. You have achieved […]
Read More »This is the FINAL reminder to all faculty whose family members are students eligible for the USFA Scholarship and who have successfully completed degree credit courses taken in the 2012-2013 academic year (May 1, 2012 –April 30, 2013). The USFA scholarship is open to students who are immediate family members of members of the University […]
Read More »This is a reminder to all faculty whose family members are students eligible for the USFA Scholarship and who have successfully completed degree credit courses taken in the 2012-2013 academic year (May 1, 2012 –April 30, 2013). The USFA scholarship is open to students who are immediate family members of members of the University of […]
Read More »It has come to our attention that junior faculty have been counseled by not to publish results from their PhD thesis, as the various standards require that tenure and promotion candidates provide “compelling evidence that a body of high quality scholarly work has been completed beyond that demonstrated at appointment” (our emphasis). One reading of […]
Read More »Who judges your case file? – By your colleagues. How is your case judged? – By the standards that your department, college and university colleagues have written, and using the written case that has been prepared. Two important points to note. The first is that it will benefit you to provide a well-written and straightforward […]
Read More »The summative parts of SEEQ in aggregate form can be used in case files. But can SEEQ comments be included in the tenure/promotion package? The Association has been in discussions with the Employer for some time concerning the status of free-form comments in student evaluation forms. As long as the encrypted ID can identify the […]
Read More »